India refuse to ‘shake hands’ with England: Test Ends in Row

India refuse to 'shake hands' with England

India Refuse to ‘Shake Hands’ with England: Manchester Test Ends in Controversy


The second-last Test at Manchester, part of the riveting India-England series, didn’t end in the milder way of handshakes and mutual respect but with controversy and heated arguments. A benediction gesture after a long Indian innings was transformed into a flashpoint when India refuse to ‘shake hands’ with England and insisted on carrying on with their innings against Ben Stokes’ offer for a draw.

The last day wore on, and it was clear the match was heading toward a stalemate. After 138 overs, India stood at 386/4 with a lead of 75 runs. Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar were sailing towards well-deserved centuries. The English bowlers looked flat after a hard day in the sun with no breakthrough. At that point, England captain Ben Stokes walked over and suggested a mutual draw; this is something usually acceptable in dead rubbers. Much to everyone’s amazement, however, the Indian camp turned down the proposition.

The Refusal That Sparked Debate

When India rejected a ‘handshake’ with England, it was more than just a refusal of a draw; it was a statement question then, that two batters nearing personal milestones ought to be allowed to finish what they had started. While Stokes’ gesture was viewed as an act of sportsmanship, India, quite understandably, saw it as a little premature. Meanwhile, Jadeja and Sundar looked hardly perturbed by this; they seemed to be batting fluently, holding their concentration throughout.

England was taken by surprise when India refuse to ‘shake hands’ with England. Ben Stokes, for one, was seen shaking his head and walking away in utter displeasure. Tension had begun to simmer across the field. A minor quarrel was caught on the stump mic, this one involving Harry Brook and Ravindra Jadeja, with Zak Crawley joining in. By the time the drinks came, the atmosphere was solidified, rather than relieved. 

Sanjay Manjrekar, commentating live, summed it up well: “Don’t think India will shake hands with England just yet. You’ve got two batters approaching centuries. If the roles were reversed, would Stokes have done the same? India refusing to shake hands here, and I think that’s the right thing to do.”

Personal Glory vs Sporting Etiquette

For India, it was about the moment. Jadeja and Sundar had carried the weight of a mammoth comeback. From a precarious position of 0/2 chasing the 311-run England lead, the team had staged a recovery. Under pressure, Shubman Gill was rock-solid with his counterpart Shreyas Iyer, who squandered a valuable 90. But the partnership of Jadeja and Sundar, with over 170 runs, brought India back into it. 

By the time they neared their hundreds, they weren’t just scoring runs; they were making a statement of grit, hitting Jadeja’s hundred with the sword celebration: a defiant message indeed. And soon after, Sundar reached his century himself, turning heads with all the muted applause and frustrated faces from the English.

The Brook Factor and England’s Unhappy Exit

With one hand, they seemed to be protesting. Part-time spinner Harry Brook was introduced into the attack by England. He accomplished nothing: full tosses and half-trackers being put away with consummate ease. They were trying to hurry this match to an end and dissociate themselves from all of it. Sporting manners had prematurely been thrown overboard.

Though a result was out of the question, India’s avowed intention of not taking this draw stands for their dedication. It had revived discussions in cricketing circles of the fine line between sportsmanship and personal milestones.

A Heated End to a Test with No Winner

Eventually, the match ended without much clamor with a draw. However, the last few moments ensured that this Test would be remembered for something much more than mere runs and wickets. Therefore came to be that India refuse to ‘shake hands’ with England—an emblem of assertiveness that divided opinions from that day onward. 

The draw was frustrating for England, but they maintained their 2-1 lead in the series. On the contrary, India walks into London with confidence and belief. Although the controversy may have somewhat sullied the spirit, it certainly does good by generating interest in the final of the series. 

Live Cricket Match Prediction: What Comes Next?

The controversy has shaped live cricket match predictions. The drama and psychological contest amongst the sides are becoming key components in outcome prediction. Going into the final Test, pundits have to consider form, pitch conditions, and now mental resolve and morale.

The avenues for live cricket match predictions are abuzz with speculation on how England will respond and whether India could take a strong emotional step to level the series.

Such moments in high-voltage cricket go huge in turning the momentum. As India refuse to ‘shake hands’ with England, they have possibly ignited the kind of fire that leads to a memorable finale.

Final Thoughts

There were plenty of things to talk about after the Manchester Test. The sporting gesture by Stokes, India’s stubbornness, Jadeja with his sword celebration, and Brook with his symbolic bowling: every moment added one more layer to the story.

As the teams prepare for the decider at the Oval, one thing is guaranteed: no handshaking until the last ball is bowled.

FAQs

  1. Why did India refuse to accept the draw offer from Ben Stokes?

India wanted Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar to complete their well-deserved centuries. They declined the offer to end the match early as both batters were close to personal milestones.

  1. What does “India refuse to ‘shake hands’ with England” mean in this context?

It refers to India not accepting England’s offer to mutually end the game, choosing instead to continue batting despite the inevitable draw.

  1. What is the impact of this incident on the live prediction of a cricket match?

It adds emotional and psychological layers to the prediction by considering the team morale, individual motivations as well as on-field behaviors.

  1. What was the reaction of England’s players to India’s decision?

Ben Stokes and Harry Brook, among other English players, were visibly frustrated. A minor exchange of words ensued, and England introduced part-time bowlers to quicken the proceedings.

  1. What do we expect from the final Test in London?

Following the tumultuous ending of the Manchester Test, this last Test will be expected to be fiercely contested, with both teams eager to show supremacy and freaking get even.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *